Home Use canonical link with meaningful or shortened url? (Which is recommended)
Reply: 0

Use canonical link with meaningful or shortened url? (Which is recommended)

MrMAG
1#
MrMAG Published in 2017-12-07 20:28:53Z

Heyho,
Similar to the Question: #32733809, I want to prevent SEO from duplicated content.
I've a separate domain only for shortened URL (mainly for sharing purpose)

I plan to set the rel=canonical in the HTML head and redirect to the long-version on request, identified through the unique content-id (similar how stackoverflow does).

Which URL should I advisedly point to, getting the highest potential in regard to SEO? <link rel="canonical" href="https://www.mainpage.com/content/1012921/">
or
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.mainpage.com/content/1012921/this-is-the-original-and-long-version/">
or
<link rel="canonical" href="https://sho.rt/yd8eEndSX/">

Content-id wont change, but Domain/TLD (even if not assumed to) could.
Shortend Domain/TLD won't never change.

You need to login account before you can post.

About| Privacy statement| Terms of Service| Advertising| Contact us| Help| Sitemap|
Processed in 0.310976 second(s) , Gzip On .

© 2016 Powered by mzan.com design MATCHINFO